Case C-341/05, Laval

 
 
Identified should be:
 
● The parties of the case
 
● The subject of the case
 
● The structure of Free Movement cases:
-Element of EU law
-Does the case fall under EU free movement law?
-Which free movement rights are restricted?
-Is the restriction distinctive or indistinctive / discriminatory or non-discriminatory?
-Is the restriction justified?
-Is the restriction proportionate?
-Is the restriction necessary in a democratic society?
 
● What did the ECJ decide?
 
● Link to human rights in the case
 
● Importance of the case against the background of human rights’ protection

 

What were the values weighed by the ECJ?


In this case, was a restriction of a fundamental freedom of the EU justified by a fundamental right, or was it vice versa - a restriction of a fundamental right justified by a fundamental freedom of the EU?