STUDY OUTCOMES
Study Outcomes
● tariff and quantitative restrictions
● direct restrictions and MEEs
● direct and indirect discrimination
● distinctly and indistinctly applicable measures
● derogations deriving from law and derogations deriving from case law
The student orients in:
● the legal basis of free movement of goods
● the core case law on free movement of goods
-Dassonville
-Cassis de Dijon
-Keck
-Towing Trailers
The student is able to analyse:
● does the case fall under EU free movement law?
● which free movement rights are infringed?
● is the infringement justified?
● is the measure proportionate, justified and necessary in a democratic society?
|
STUDY OUTCOME |
MATERIALS |
I GRADE |
CRITERIA |
|
1. The student distinguishes between tariff and quantitative restrictions. |
Theoretical materials referred in the Course Map.
Articles 28-30 TFEU; Articles 34-36 TFEU;
|
● MCT. ● Solution of a case-pattern. |
● The student defines tariff and quantitative restrictions. ● The student knows the content of Articles 28-30 TFEU and 34-36 TFEU. ● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |
|
2. The student distinguishes between direct restrictions and MEEs. |
Theoretical materials referred in the Course Map. Article 30 TFEU; Articles 34-35 TFEU. |
● MCT. ● Solution of a case-pattern. |
● The student defines direct restrictions and MEEs. ● The student knows the content of Articles 30 TFEU and 34-35 TFEU. ● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |
|
3. The student distinguishes between direct and indirect discrimination.
|
Theoretical materials referred in the Course Map. Case law. |
● MCT. ● Solution of a case-pattern.
|
● The student defines direct and indirect discrimination. ● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |
|
4. The student distinguishes between distinctly and indistinctly applicable measures. |
Theoretical materials referred in the Course Map. Articles 28-30 TFEU; Articles 34-36 TFEU. |
● Solution of a case-pattern. |
● The student defines distinctly and indistinctly applicable measures. ● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |
|
5. The student distinguishes between derogations deriving from law and derogations deriving from case law. |
Theoretical materials referred in the Course Map. Article 36 TFEU. Case law of the CJEU. |
● MCT. ● Solution of a case-pattern.
|
● The student names the derogations. ● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |
|
6. The student orients in the legal basis of free movement of goods. |
Articles 28-37 TFEU. Directives. |
● Solution of a case-pattern.
|
● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |
|
7. The student orients in the core case law on free movement of goods. |
-Dassonville |
● MCT. ● Solution of a case-pattern. |
● The student recognizes the case. ● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |
|
8. The student is able to analyse why does the case fall under EU free movement law.
|
Theoretical materials referred in the Course Map. Case law of the CJEU. |
● Solution of a case-pattern.
|
● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |
|
9. The student is able to analyse which free movement rights are infringed.
|
Theoretical materials referred in the Course Map. Case law of the CJEU. |
● Solution of a case-pattern.
|
● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |
|
10. The student is able to analyse whether the infringement is justified.
|
Theoretical materials referred in the Course Map. Case law of the CJEU. |
● Solution of a case-pattern.
|
● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |
|
11. The student is able to analyse whether the measure is proportionate, justified and necessary in a democratic society.
|
Theoretical materials referred in the Course Map. Case law of the CJEU. |
● MCT. ● Solution of a case-pattern.
|
● The student defines proportionality and necessity. ● Case pattern is solved according to EU law. |