Quality management plan (QMP) and quality dossier

Evaluation of results/products*

     

Quality dossier

WP

Products

Partner Responsible

Internal Evaluator

External Evaluator

Local Committee

 

WP 1

State of the Art Report on Distance Learning Quality for SMEs (PR 1)

Criteria for Evaluating Quality in e-Learning (PR 2)
 

P7 - NKI

P5 - CCC

InterMedia (pp. 157-158)
PR 1 and PR 2 together (Tool)
Summary

WP 2

Guide for Training Consultants: e-Learning Quality and ROI Evaluation (PR 3)

Training Profile: Training Consultants Performance Improvement Programme (PR 4; Annexes 1-6)
 

P1 - CECOA

P6 – PW

PR3 - Ruben Eiras

PR4 - Ruben Eiras

PR 3
Summary
(Tool)
PR 4
Summary
(Tool)

WP 3

ROI Methodology for e-Learning Courses: working version (PR 5)
 

Web-based ROI calculator

P6 – PW

P2 – BFI

Ed Fennema - CEO of SkillThing BV and De Volgende Verdieping BV (Netherlands)
 

WP 4

Report on Application of the ROI Methodology for e-Learning Courses (PR 6)
 

P5 - CCC

P3- FBB

Prof. Jose R. Santolalla,
University of Barcelona,
European Comission
Education and Culture Committee
“Lifelong Learning Programme”
Representative of the Employers
of Eurocommerce
PR 6
Summary
(Tool)
 

WP 5

Final version of the ROI Methodology for e-Learning Courses (PR 7)
 

P2 - BFI

P6 - PW

Wolfgang Schaffer -  authorized officer
and sales manager for Austria of BIT Schulungscenter NfG GmbH & Co KG.
PR 7
Summary
(Tool)
 

WP 6

Guide to Conceive and Evaluate E-Learning Courses for SMEs Entrepreneurs and Training Providers: Implementing E-Learning in SMEs (PR 8,9)
CD-version

 

P3 - FBB

P7 - NKI

Astrid Bleck-Klatt PR 8 and PR 9 together
Summary
(Tool)

WP 7

Quality management

P4 - UT

On-going processes evaluation: transnational meetings (Tool, Summary, Minutes)
and audio conferences
(Minutes)
 

 1st report

2nd (last) report  

WP 8

Valorisation

P1 - CECOA

Valorisation Plan in Numbers (xls)

* Tools and responsibilites for product evaluation

  • Timeframe for evaluation will be outlined in WP proposal by partner responsible for WP

  • -Evaluation tools/forms for PR will be developed by partner responsible for WP with help of CECOA and UT

  • -Selection of external expert is done in the planning phase of the WP & invited by partner responsible

- 1 month after PR finalization the evaluation is conducted and reports sent to UT
  • - External report by partner responsible
  • -  report by internal evaluator
  • - LC report from all the partners
- 1 month after receiving the reports the quality dossier is amended by UT