Üldist kirjandust

Adoutte, A., G. Balavoine, N. Lartillot, O. Lespinet, B. Prud'homme, & R. de Rosa. 2000. The new animal phylogeny: Reliability and implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA 97: 4453-4456. [pdf]

Aguinaldo A. M., Turbeville, J. M., Linford, L. S., Rivera, M. C., Garey, J. R., Raff, R. A., Lake, J. A. 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals.  Nature 387: 489-493.

Arisue, N., Hasegawa, M. & Hashimoto, T. 2005. Root of the Eukaryota Tree as Inferred from Combined Maximum Likelihood Analyses of Multiple Molecular Sequence Data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 409-420. [pdf]

Ax, P. 1987. The Phylogenetic System. The Systematization of Organisms on the Basis of Their

Phylogenesis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Baldauf, S. L. 2003. The Deep Roots of Eukaryotes. Science 300: 1703-1706.

Baldauf, S. L., Roger, A. J., Wenk-Siefert, I., Doolittle, W. F. 2000. A Kingdom-Level Phylogeny of Eukaryotes Based on Combined Protein Data. Science 290: 972-977.

Bapteste, E., Brinkmann, H., Lee, J. A., Moore, D. V., Sensen, C. W., Gordon, P., Duruflé, L., Gaasterland, T., Lopez, P., Müller, M. & Philippe, H. 2002. The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA 99: 1414-1419. [pdf]

Blair, J. E. & Hedges, S. B. 2005. Molecular Clocks Do Not Support the Cambrian Explosion. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 387-390. [pdf]

Blair, J. E., Ikeo, K., Gojobori, T. & Hedges, S. B. 2002. The evolutionary position of nematodes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2: 7. [pdf]

Brusca, R. C. & Brusca, G. J. 2003. Invertebrates. Second Edition. Sinauer Associations, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 880 pp.

Cafaro, M. J. 2005. Eccrinales (Trichomycetes) are not fungi, but a clade of protists at the early divergence of animals and fungi. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 21–34.

Cameron, C. B, Garey, J. R. & Swalla, B. J. 2000. Evolution of the chordate body plan: New insights from phylogenetic analyses of deuterostome phyla. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA 97: 4469-4474. [pdf]

Cavalier-Smith, T. 1998. A Revised Six-Kingdom System of Life. Biological Reviews 73: 203-266.

Cavalier-Smith, T. 1999. Principles of protein and lipid targeting in secondary symbiogenesis: Euglenoid, dinoflagellate, and sporozoan plastid origins and the eukaryote family tree. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 46: 347-366.

Cavalier-Smith, T. 2002a. The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 52: 7-76. [pdf]

Cavalier-Smith, T. 2002b. The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 52: 297-354. [pdf]

Cavalier-Smith, T. 2003. The excavate protozoan phyla Metamonada Grassé emend. (Anaeromonadea, Parabasalia, Carpediemonas, Eopharyngia) and Loukozoa emend. (Jakobea, Malawimonas): their evolutionary affinities and new higher taxa. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 53: 1741-1758.

Copley, R. R., Aloy, P., Russell, R. B. & Telford, M. J. 2004. Systematic searches for molecular synapomorphies in model metazoan genomes give some support for Ecdysozoa after accounting for the idiosyncrasies of Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution & Development 6: 164-169.

Eernisse, D. J. & Peterson, K. J. 2004. The history of animals. 197-208 in Cracraft, J. & Donoghue, M. J. (eds.) Assembling the Tree of Life. Oxford University Press, New York. 592 pp.

Falkowski, P. G., Katz, M. E., Knoll, A. H., Quigg, A., Raven, J. A., Schofield, O. & Taylor, F. J. R. 2004. The Evolution of Modern Eukaryotic Phytoplankton. Science 305: 354-360.

Grzebyk, D., Katz, M. E., Knoll, A. H., Quigg, A., Raven, J. A., Schofield, O., Taylor, F. J. R. & Falkowski, P. G. 2004. Response to Comment on "The Evolution of Modern Eukaryotic Phytoplankton". Science 306: 2191.

Giribet, G. 2002. Current advances in the phylogenetic reconstruction of metazoan evolution. A new paradigm for the Cambrian explosion? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 345-357.

Glenner, H., Hansen, A. J., S¸rensen, M. V., Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Willerslev, E. 2004. Bayesian Inference of the Metazoan Phylogeny: A Combined Molecular and Morphological Approach. Current Biology 14: 1644-1649; Erratum: Current Biology 15: 392-393 (2005).

Haase, A., Stern, M., Wächtler, K. & Bicker, G. 2001. A tissue-specific marker of Ecdysozoa. Development Genes and Evolution 211: 428-433.

Halanych, K. M., Bacheller, J. D., Aguinaldo, A. M., Liva, S. M., Hillis, D. M. & Lake, J. A. 1995. Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that the lophophorates are protostome animals. Science 267: 1641-1643.

Halanych , K. M. 2004. The new view of animal phylogeny. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 229-256.

Harper, J. T. & Keeling, P. J. 2003. Nucleus-Encoded, Plastid-Targeted Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GAPDH) Indicates a Single Origin for Chromalveolate Plastids. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1730–1735. [pdf]

Harper, J. T., Waanders, E. & Keeling, P. J. 2005. On the monophyly of chromalveolates using a six-protein phylogeny of eukaryotes. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 55: 487–496.

Hausdorf, B. 2000. Early evolution of the Bilateria. Systematic Biology 49: 130-142.

Hausmann, K., Hülsmann, N. & Radek, R. 2003. Protistology. 3rd. ed. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart. 379 pp.

Hillis, D. M., Pollock, D. D., McGuire, J.A. & Zwickl, D. J. 2003. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? Systematic Biology 52: 124-126.

Javaux, E. J., Knoll, A. H. & Walter, M. 2003. Recognizing and Interpreting the Fossils of Early Eukaryotes. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 33: 75-94.

Järvekülg, A. 1981-1982. Loomade elu. 1.-2. köide. Valgus, Tallinn.

Katz, M. E., Finkel, Z. V., Grzebyk, D., Knoll, A. H. & Falkowski, P. G. 2004. Evolutionary trajectories and biogeochemical impacts of marine eukaryotic phytoplankton. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 523–556.

Lang, B. F., O'Kelly, C., Nerad, T., Gray, M. W. & Burger, G. 2002. The Closest Unicellular Relatives of Animals.  Current Biology 12: 1773-1778.

Larget, B., Simon, D. L., Kadane, J. B. & Sweet, D. 2005. A Bayesian Analysis of Metazoan Mitochondrial Genome Arrangements. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 486-495. [pdf]

Lepland, A. & Lepland, A. 2002. Elu jäljed ürgses kivis. Eesti Loodus 53: 8–14.

Longet, D., Archibald, J. M., Keeling, P. J. & Pawlowski, J. 2003. Foraminifera and Cercozoa share a common origin according to RNA polymerase II phylogenies. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 53: 1735-1739.

Lotman, K. 1998. Kas uus lüli loomariigi fülogeneesis? Schola Biotheoretica 24: 43-45.

Mallatt, J. M., Garey, J. R. & Shultz, J. W. 2004. Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 178-191.

Margulis, L., Dolan, M. F. & Guerrero, R. 2000. The chimeric eukaryote: Origin of the nucleus from the karyomastigont in amitochondriate protists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA 97: 6954-6959. [pdf]

Martin, W. & Müller, M. 1998. The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote. Nature 392: 37-41.

Mayr, E. 1998. Two empires or three? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA 95: 9720-9723. [pdf]

Mayr, E. & Ashlock, P. D. 1991. Principles of Systematic Zoology. Second editon. McGraw-Hill, Inc. 476 pp.

Mendoza, L., Taylor, J. W & Ajello, L. 2002. THE CLASS MESOMYCETOZOEA: A Heterogeneous Group of Microorganisms at the Animal-Fungal Boundary. Annual Review of Microbiology 56: 315-354.

Miller, D. J., Ball, E. E. & Technau, U. 2005. Cnidarians and ancestral genetic complexity in the animal kingdom. Trends in Genetics 21: 536-539.

Moreira, D. & López-García, P. 1998. Symbiosis Between Methanogenic Archaea and δ-Proteobacteria as the Origin of Eukaryotes: The Syntrophic Hypothesis. Journal of Molecular Evolution 47: 517 - 530.

Moreira, D, Le Guyader, H. & Philippe, H. 2000. The origin of red algae and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature  405: 69-72.

Nielsen, C. 2001. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. Second Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 568 pp.

Nielsen, C. 2003. Proposing a solution to the Articulata-Ecdysozoa controversy. Zoologica Scripta 32: 475-482.

Olli, K. Elusa looduse jaotused.

Olli, K. Protistid.

Patterson, D. J. 1999. The diversity of eukaryotes. American Naturalist 154 (supplement): S96-S124.

Pennisi, E. 2003. Modernizing the Tree of Life. Science 300: 1692-1697.

Peterson, K. J. & Eernisse, D. J. 2001. Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences. Evolution & Development 3: 170-205.

Peterson, K. J., Lyons, J. B., Nowak, K. S., Takacs, C. M., Wargo, M. J. & McPeek, M. A. 2004. Estimating metazoan divergence times with a molecular clock. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 101: 6536-6541. [pdf]

Philip, G. K., Creevey, C. J. & McInerney, J. O. 2005. The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa may not be Clades: Stronger Support for the Grouping of Plant and Animal than for Animal and Fungi and Stronger Support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1175-1184. [pdf]

Philippe, H., Lopez, P., Brinkmann, H., Budin, K., Germot, A., Laurent, J., Moreira, D., Müller, M. & Le Guyader, H. 2000. Early-branching or fast-evolving eukaryotes? An answer based on slowly evolving positions. Proceedings of Royal Society of London B 267: 1213-1221.

Philippe, H., Snell, E. A., Bapteste, E., Lopez, P., Holland, P. W. H. & Casane, D. 2004. Phylogenomics of Eukaryotes: Impact of Missing Data on Large Alignments. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1740-1752. [pdf]

Philippe, H., Lartillot, N. & Brinkmann, H. 2005. Multigene Analyses of Bilaterian Animals Corroborate the Monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa and Protostomia.  Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1246-1253. [pdf]

Ragan, M. A., Goggin, C. L., Cawthorn, R. J., Cerenius, L., Jamieson, A. V. C., Plourde, S. M., Rand, T. G., Söderhäll, K. & Gutell, R. R. 1996. A novel clade of protistan parasites near the animal-fungal divergence. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 93: 11907-11912. [pdf]

Rivera, M. C. & Lake, J. A. 2004. The ring of life provides evidence for a genome fusion origin of eukaryotes. Nature 431: 152-155.

Rokas, A., King, N., Finnerty, J. & Carroll, S. B. 2003a. Conflicting phylogenetic signals at the base of the metazoan tree. Evolution & Development 5: 346-359.

Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N. & Carroll., S. B. 2003b. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.

Ruiz-Trillo, I., Inagaki, Y., Davis, L. A., Sperstad, S., Landfald, B. & Roger, A. J. 2004b. Capsaspora owczarzaki is an independent opisthokont lineage. Current Biology 14: R946–R947.

Simpson, A. G. B. 2003. Cytoskeletal organization, phylogenetic affinities and systematics in the contentious taxon Excavata (Eukaryota). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 53: 1759-1777.

Simpson A. G. B. & Roger, A. J. 2002. Eukaryotic Evolution: Getting to the Root of the Problem. Current Biology 12: R691-R693.

Simpson A. G. B. & Roger, A. J. 2004. The real ‘kingdoms’ of eukaryotes. Current Biology 14: R693-R696.

Stechmann, A & Cavalier-Smith, T. 2002. Rooting the Eukaryote tree by using a derived gene fusion. Science 297: 89-91.

Stechmann, A & Cavalier-Smith, T. 2003. The root of the Eukaryote tree pinpointed. Current Biology 13: R665-R666.

Telford, M. J., Wise, M. J. & Gowri-Shankar, V. 2005. Consideration of RNA Secondary Structure Significantly Improves Likelihood-Based Estimates of Phylogeny: Examples from the Bilateria. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1129-1136. [pdf]

Tice, M. M. & Lowe, D. R. 2004. Photosynthetic microbial mats in the 3,416-Myr-old ocean. Nature 431: 549-552.

Zrzavy, J. 2001. The interrelationships of metazoan parasites: a review of phylum- and higher-level hypotheses from recent morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. Folia Parasitologica 48: 81-103.

Zrzavy, J. 2003. Gastrotricha and metazoan phylogeny. Zoologica Scripta 32: 61-81.

Valentine, J. W. 1997. Cleavage patterns and the topology of the metazoan tree of life. 94: Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 8001–8005. [pdf]

Valentine, J. W. 2002. Prelude to the Cambrian explosion. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 30: 285-306.

Wang, D. Y., Kumar, S. & Hedges, S. B. 1999. Divergence time estimates for the early history of animal phyla and the origin of plants, animals and fungi. Proceedings of Royal Society of London B 266: 163-171.

Woese, C. R. 1998. The universal ancestor. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA  95: 6854-6859. [pdf]

Woese, C. R, Kandler, O. & Wheelis, M. L. 1990. Towards a Natural System of Organisms: Proposal for the Domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 87: 4576-4579. [pdf]

Wolf, Y. I., Rogozin, I. B., & Koonin, E. V. 2004. Coelomata and Not Ecdysozoa: Evidence From Genome-Wide Phylogenetic Analysis. Genome Research 14: 29-36. [pdf]

Yoon, H. S., Hackett, J. D, Pinto, G. & Bhattacharya, D. 2002. The single, ancient origin of chromist plastids Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 99:  15507-15512. [pdf]



Borchiellini, C., Manuel, M., Alivon, E., Boury-Esnault, N., Vacelet, J. & Le Parco, Y. 2001. Sponge paraphyly and the origin of Metazoa. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 171-179.

Borojevic, R., Boury-Esnault N. & Vacelet J. 2000. A revision of the supraspecific classification of the subclass Calcaronea (Porifera, class Calcarea). Zoosystema 22: 203-263. [pdf]

Botting, J. P & Butterfield, N. J. 2005. Reconstructing early sponge relationships by using the Burgess Shale fossil Eiffelia globosa, Walcott. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 102: 1554-1559. [pdf]

Hooper, J. N. A. 2000. Guide to Sponge Collection and Identification.

Kruse, M., Leys, S. P., Müller, I. M. & Müller, W. E. G. 1998. Phylogenetic Position of the Hexactinellida Within the Phylum Porifera Based on the Amino Acid Sequence of the Protein Kinase C from Rhabdocalyptus dawsoni. Journal of Molecular Evolution 46: 721-728.

Manuel, M., Borchiellini, C., Alivon, E., Le Parco, Y., Vacelet, J., Boury-Esnault, N. 2003. Phylogeny and evolution of calcareous sponges : monophyly of calcinea and calcaronea, high level of morphological homoplasy, and the primitive nature of axial symmetry. Systematic Biology 52: 311-333.

Müller, W. E. G. 2001. Review: How was metazoan threshold crossed? The hypothetical Urmetazoa. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 129: 433–460.


Ender, A. & Schierwater, B. 2003. Placozoa are not derived cnidarians: Evidence from molecular morphology. Molecular Biology & Evolution 20: 130-134. [pdf]

Voigt, O., Collins, A. G., Pearse, V. B., Pearse, J. S., Ender, A., Hadrys, H. & Schierwater, B. 2004. Placozoa – no longer a phylum of one. Current Biology 14: R944-R945.


Systematics of Cubozoa.

Marques, A. C. & Collins, A. G. 2004. Cladistic analysis of Medusozoa and cnidarian evolution. Invertebrate Biology 123: 23-42.

Mills, C.E. Internet 1999-present. Stauromedusae: list of all valid species names.



Anderson, C. L., Canning, E. U., Okamura, B. 1998. A triploblast origin for Myxozoa? Nature 392: 346-347.

Kent, M. L., K. B. Andree, J. L. Bartholomew, M. El-Matbouli, S. S. Desser, R. H. Devlin, S. W. Feist, R. P. Hedrick, R. W. Hoffmann, J. Khattra, S. L. Hallett, R. J. G. Lester, M. Longshaw, O. Palenzeula, M. E. Siddall, and C. Xiao. 2001. Recent advances in our knowledge of the Myxozoa. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 48: 395-413.

Monteiro, A.S., Okamura, B. & Holland, P.W.H. 2002. Orphan worm finds a home: Buddenbrockia is a myxozoan. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 968-971. [pdf]

Okamura, B. & Canning, E. U. 2003. Orphan worms and homeless parasites enhance bilaterian diversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 633-639.

Okamura, B., A. Curry, T. S. Wood & E. U. Canning. 2002. Ultrastructure of Buddenbrockia identifies it as a myxozoan and verifies the bilaterian origin of the Myxozoa. Parasitology 124: 215-223.



Hanelt, B., van Schyndel, D., Adema, C. M., Lewis, L. A. & Loker, E. S. 1996. The phylogenetic position of Rhopalura ophiocomae (Orthonectida) based on 18S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis
Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 1187-1191. [pdf]

Katayama, T., Wada, H., Furuya, H., Satoh, N. & Yamamoto, M. 1995. Phylogenetic Position of the Dicyemid Mesozoa Inferred from 18S rDNA Sequences. The Biological Bulletin 189: 81-90. [pdf]

Kobayashi, M., Furuya, H. & Holland, P. W. H. 1999. Evolution: Dicyemids are higher animals. Nature 401: 762

Noto, T. & Endoh, H. 2004. A "chimera" theory on the origin of dicyemid mesozoans: evolution driven by frequent lateral gene transfer from host to parasite. BioSystems 73: 73-83.

Pawlowski, J., Montoya-Burgos, J. I., Fahrni, J. F., Wuest, J. & Zaninetti, L. 1996. Origin of the Mesozoa inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 1128-1132. [pdf]



Mills, C.E. Internet 1998-present. Phylum Ctenophora: list of all valid species names.

Podar, M., Haddock, S. H. D., Sogin, M. L. & Harbison, G. R. 2001. A Molecular Phylogenetic Framework for the Phylum Ctenophora Using 18S rRNA Genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 218–230.

Wallberg, A., Thollesson, M., Farris, J. S. & Jondelius, U. 2004. The phylogenetic position of the comb jellies (Ctenophora) and the importance of taxonomic sampling. Cladistics 20: 558–578.



Baguñà, J. & Riutort, M. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of the Platyhelminthes. Canadian Journal of Zoology  82: 168-193.

Ruiz-Trillo, I., Riutort, M., Littlewood, D. T. J., Hernieu, E. A., Baguñà, J. 1999. Acoel flatworms: earliest extant bilaterian metazoans, not members of Platyhelminthes. Science 283: 1919-1923.

Ruiz-Trillo, I., Paps, J., Loukota, M., Ribera, C., Jondelius, U., Baguñà, J., Riutort, M. 2002. A phylogenetic analysis of myosin heavy chain type II sequences corroborates that Acoela and Nemertoderematida are basal bilaterians. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 99: 11246-11251. [pdf]

Ruiz-Trillo, I., Riutort, M., Matthew Fourcade, H., Baguñà, J. & Boore, J. L. 2004a. Mitochondrial genome data support the basal position of Acoelomorpha and the polyphyly of the Platyhelminthes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 321–332.

Telford, M. J., Lockyer, A. E., Cartwright-Finch, C., Littlewood, D. T. J. 2003. Combined large and small subunit ribosomal RNA phylogenies support a basal position of the acoelomorph flatworms. Proceedings of Royal Society of London B 270: 1077-1083.

Tyler, S. 2003. Platyhelminthes: the nature of a controversial phylum.

Tyler, S., Schilling, S., Hooge, M. & Bush, L. F. (comp.). Turbellarian taxonomic database. Version 1.4.



Segers, H. 2002. The nomenclature of the Rotifera: annotated checklist of valid familyand genus-group names. Journal of Natural History 36: 631–640.

Örstan, A. LIBS - Literature Index for Bdelloid Rotifers.




Giribet, G., S¸rensen, M. V., Funch, P., Kristensen, R. M. & Sterrer, W. 2004a. Investigations into the phylogenetic position of Micrognathozoa using four molecular loci. Cladistics 20: 1-13.

Kristensen, R. M. & Funch, P. 2000. Micrognathozoa: A New Class With Complicated Jaws Like Those of Rotifera and Gnathostomulida. Journal of Morphology 246: 1–49.



Helfenbein, K. G., Fourcade, H. M., Vanjani, R. G. & Boore, J. L. 2004. The mitochondrial genome of Paraspadella gotoi is highly reduced and reveals that chaetognaths are a sister group to protostomes. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 101: 10639–10643. [pdf]

Papillon, D., Perez, Y., Caubit, X. & Le Parco, Y. 2004. Identification of Chaetognaths as Protostomes Is Supported by the Analysis of Their Mitochondrial Genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 2122–2129. [pdf]

Telford, M. J. 2004. Affinity for arrow worms. Nature 431: 254-256.

Thuesen, E. V. Chaetognatha.



Passamaneck, Y. J. & Halanych, K. M. 2004. Evidence from Hox genes that bryozoans are lophotrochozoans. Evolution & Development 6: 275–281.



Cohen, B. L. & Weydmann, A. 2005. Molecular evidence that phoronids are a subtaxon of brachiopods (Brachiopoda: Phoronata) and that genetic divergence of metazoan phyla began long before the early Cambrian. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5: 253–273.

de Rosa, R. 2001. Molecular data indicate the protostome affinity of brachiopods. Systematic Biology 50: 848–859.



Eeckhaut, I., McHugh, D., Mardulyn, P., Tiedemann, R., Monteyne, D., Jangous, M., & Milinkovitch, M. 2000. Myzostomida: a link between trochozoans and flatworms? Proceedings of Royal Society of London B 267: 1383-1392.

McHugh, D. 1997. Molecular evidence that echiurans and pogonophorans are derived annelids. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 94: 8006–8009. [pdf]

Rousset, V., Rouse, G. W., Siddall, M. E., Tillier, A. & Pleijel, F. 2004. The phylogenetic position of Siboglinidae (Annelida) inferred from 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA and morphological data. Cladistics 20: 518–533.



Todaro, M. A. Gastrotricha.



Cutler, E. B. Sipuncula Classification.

Maxmen, A. B., King, B. F., Cutler, E. B. & Giribet, G. 2003. Evolutionary relationships within the protostome phylum Sipuncula: a molecular analysis of ribosomal genes and histone H3 sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27: 489-503.



Aplacophoran genera.


Jeffery, P. & The Natural History Museum. GastroClass: Gastropod Classification.

Pina, A. Sistemática.

Steiner, G. & Kabat, A. R. 2001. Catalogue of supraspecific taxa of Scaphopoda (Mollusca). Zoosystema 23: 433-460. [pdf]



Tardigrada Taxonomy.



Abe, M. & Smith David R. 1991. The genus-group names of Symphyta (Hymenoptera) and their type species. Esakia 31: 1–115.

Cranston, P.S. & Gullan, P.J. 2003. The Phylogeny of Insects, in Encyclopedia of Entomology edited by R.T. Carde & V.H. Resh. Academic/Elsevier. [pdf]

Dunlop, J. A. & Arango, C. P. 2005. Pycnogonid affnities: a review. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 43: 8-21.

Giribet, G., Edgecombe, G. D. & Wheeler, W. C. 2001. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413: 157-161.

Giribet, G., Edgecombe, G. D., Wheeler, W. C. & Babbitt, C. 2002. Phylogeny and systematic position of opiliones: a combined analysis of Chelicerata relationships using morphological and molecular data. Cladistics 18: 5-70.

Giribeta, G., Edgecombe, G. D., Carpenter, J. M., D’Haese, C. A. & Wheeler, W. C. 2004b. Is Ellipura monophyletic? A combined analysis of basal hexapod relationships with emphasis on the origin of insects. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 4: 319–340.

International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1996. Megalodontidae Konow, 1897 (Insecta, Hymenoptera): spelling emended to Megalodontesidae, so removing the homonymy with Megalodontidae Morris & Lycett. 1853 (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 53: 66-67.

Harzsch, S. 2004. The tritocerebrum of Euarthropoda: a ‘‘non-drosophilocentric’’ perspective. Evolution & Development 6: 303–309.

Hwang, U. W., Friedrich, M., Tautz, D., Park, C. J. & Kim, W. 2001. Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates. Nature 413: 154-157.

Klass, K.-D., Zompro, O., Kristensen, N. P., Adis, J. 2002. Mantophasmatodea: A New Insect Order with Extant Members in the Afrotropics. Science 296: 1456-1459.

Martin, J. W. & Davis, G. E. 2001. An updated classification of the recent Crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series 39. [pdf]

Nardi, F., Spinsanti, G., Boore, J. L., Carapelli, A., Dallai, R., Frati, F. 2003. Hexapod Origins: Monophyletic or Paraphyletic? Science 299: 1887-1889.

Schulmeister, S. 2003a. Review of morphological evidence on the phylogeny of basal Hymenoptera (Insecta), with a discussion of the ordering of characters. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 209-243.

Schulmeister, S. 2003b. Simultaneous analysis of basal Hymenoptera (Insecta) introducing robust-choice sensitivity analysis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 245-275.

Shultz, J. W. & Regier, J. C. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of arthropods using two nuclear protein-encoding genes supports a crustacean + hexapod clade. Proceedings of Royal Society of London B 267: 1011-1019.

Springate, N. D. 1994. Megalodontidae Morris & Lycett, 1853 (Mollusca, Bivalvia) and Megalodontidae Konow, 1897 (Insecta, Hymenoptera): proposed removal of homonymy. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 51: 230 231.

Springate, N. D. 1999. On the correct use of the superfamilia name Pamphilioidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Journal of Natural History 33: 1373-1377.

Tilgner, E., Klass, K.-D. 2002. Mantophasmatodea: A New Insect Order? Science 297: 731a.

Thomas, R. H. 2003. EVOLUTION: Wingless Insects and Plucked Chickens. Science 299: 1854-1855.

Viitasaari, M. 2002. A review of the extant families of the Hymenoptera, Symphyta. 175–195 in Viitasaari, M. (Ed.) Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) I. A review of the suborder, the Western Palaearctic taxa of Xyeloidea and Pamphilioidea. Tremex Press, Helsinki, 516 pp.

Viitasaari, M., Heidemaa, M., Nuorteva, M. & Zinovjev, A. 1998. An annotated checklist of the sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) of Estonia. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences: Biology and Ecology 47: 126–147.

Wei, M. 1998.Two New Genera of Allantinae From China (Hymenoptera:Tenthredinidae). Zoological Research 19: 148-152. [pdf]



Bourlat, S. J., Nielsen, C., Lockyer, A. E., Littlewood, D. T. J. & Telford, M. J. 2003. Xenoturbella is a deuterostome that eats molluscs. Nature 424: 925-928.

Israelsson, O. 1997. ...and molluscan embryogenesis. Nature 390: 32

Israelsson, O. 1999. New light on the enigmatic Xenoturbella (phylum uncertain): ontogeny and phylogeny. Proceedings of Royal Society of London B 266: 835-841.

Norén, M. & Jondelius, U. 1997. Xenoturbella's molluscan relatives... Nature 390: 31-32.



Kerr, A. M. & Kim, J. 2001. Phylogeny of Holothuroidea (Echinodermata) inferred from morphology. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 63–81.


Cameron, C. B. 2005. A phylogeny of the hemichordates based on morphological characters. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83: 196–215.

Holland, N. D., Clague, D. A., Gordon, D. P., Gebruk, A., Pawson, D. L. & Vecchione, M. 2005. ‘Lophenteropneust’ hypothesis refuted by collection and photos of new deep-sea hemichordates. Nature 434: 374–376.



Amrine-Madsen, H. Scally, M. Westerman, M., Stanhope, M. J., Krajewski, C., Springer, M. S. 2003. Nuclear gene sequences provide evidence for the monophyly of australidelphian marsupials. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 186-196.

Arnason, U., Adegoke, J. A., Bodin, K., Born, E. W., Esa, Y. B., Gullberg, A., Nilsson, M., Short, R. V., Xu, X & Janke, A. 2002. Mammalian mitogenomic relationships and the root of the eutherian tree. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 99: 8151-8156. [pdf]

Asher, R. J., Novacek, M. J., & Geisler, J. H. 2003. Relationships of Endemic African Mammals and Their Fossil Relatives Based on Morphological and Molecular Evidence. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 10: 131-194.

Baker, M. L., Wares, J. P., Harrison, G. A. & Miller, R. D. 2004. Relationships among the Families and Orders of Marsupials and the Major Mammalian Lineages Based on Recombination Activating Gene-1. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 11: 1-16.

Corneli, P. S. 2002. Complete Mitochondrial Genomes and Eutherian Evolution. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 9: 281-305.

Delarbre, C., Gallut, C., Barriel, V., Janvier, P. & Gachelin, G. 2002. Complete Mitochondrial DNA of the Hagfish, Eptatretus burgeri: The Comparative Analysis of Mitochondrial DNA Sequences Strongly Supports the Cyclostome Monophyly. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 184-192.

Glazko, G. V. & Nei, M. 2003. Estimation of Divergence Times for Major Lineages of Primate Species.  Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 424-434. [pdf]

Helgen, K. M. 2003. Major mammalian clades: a review under consideration of molecular and palaeontological evidence. Mammalian Biology 68: 1-15.

Liu, F.-G. R., M. M. Miyamoto, N. P. Freire, P. Q. Ong, M. R. Tennant, T. S. Young, K. F. Gugel 2001. Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals. Science 291: 1786-1789.

Madsen O., Scally, M., Douady, C.J., Kao, D.J., DeBry, R.W., Adkins, R., Amrine, H.M., Stanhope, M.J., de Jong, W.W., Springer, M.S. 2001. Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals. Nature 409: 610-614.

Meyer, A. & Zardoya, R. 2003. Recent Advances in the (molecular) phylogeny of Vertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 311-338.

Misawa, K. & Janke, A. 2003. Revisiting the Glires conceptphylogenetic analysis of nuclear sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 320–327.

Murphy, W.J., Eizirik, E., Johnson, W.E., Zhang, Y.P., Ryder, O.A. & O'Brien, S.J. 2001a. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409: 614-618.

Murphy, W. J., Eizirik, E., O'Brien, S. J., Madsen, O., Scally, M., Douady, C. J., Teeling, E., Ryder, O. A., Stanhope, M. J., de Jong, W. W. & Springer, M. S. 2001b. Resolution of the Early Placental Mammal Radiation Using Bayesian Phylogenetics. Science 294: 2348-2351.

Phillips, M. J. & Penny, D. 2003. The root of the mammalian tree inferred from whole mitochondrial genomes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 171-185.

Poots, L. 1987. Loomade elu. 7. köide. Imetajad. Valgus, Tallinn.

Reyes, A., Gissi, C., Catzeflis, F., Nevo, E., Pesole, G. & Saccone, C. 2004. Congruent Mammalian Trees from Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes Using Bayesian Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 397-403. [pdf]

Roca, A. L., Bar-Gal, G. K., Eizirik, E., Helgen, K. M., Maria, R., Springer, M. S., O'Brien, S. J. & Murphy, W. J. 2004. Mesozoic origin for West Indian insectivores. Nature 429: 649-651.

Ross, C. F. 2000. Into the light: the origin of Anthropoidea. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 147-194.

Shoshani, J. & McKenna, M. C. 1998. Higher Taxonomic Relationships among Extant Mammals Based on Morphology, with Selected Comparisons of Results from Molecular Data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 572-584.

Simmons, N. B. 2005. An Eocene Big Bang for Bats. Science 307: 527-528.

Springer, M. S., Teeling, E. C.,  Madsen, O., Stanhope, M. J. & de Jong, W. W. 2001. Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 98: 6241-6246. [pdf]

Springer, M. S., Murphy, W. J., Eizirik, E. & O'Brien, S. J. 2003. Placental mammal diversification and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. USA 100: 1056-1061. [pdf]

Springer, M. S., Stanhope, M. J., Madsen, O. & de Jong, W. W. 2004. Molecules consolidate the placental mammal tree. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 430-438.

Takezaki, N., Figueroa, F., Zaleska-Rutczynska, Z & Klein, J. 2003. Molecular Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates: Monophyly of the Agnathans as Revealed by Sequences of 35 Genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 287-292. [pdf]

Teeling, E. C., Springer, M. S., Madsen, O., Bates, P., O’Brien, S. J. & Murphy, W. J. 2005. A Molecular Phylogeny for Bats Illuminates Biogeography and the Fossil Record. Science 307: 580-584.

Waddell, P. J., Okada, N., & Hasegawa, M. 1999. Towards resolving the interordinal relationships of placental mammals. Systematic Biology 48: 1-5.